Volume 6, Issue 4 (11-2017)                   ABS 2017, 6(4): 100-110 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Surgery for Hepatic Hydatid Disease: A Comparative Study. ABS 2017; 6 (4) :100-110
URL: http://annbsurg.iums.ac.ir/article-1-216-en.html
Abstract:   (617 Views)
Background

laparoscopic treatment of hepatic hydatid disease has undergone revolution in parallel to progress in laparoscopic surgery. Controversies about the role laparoscopy in the management of liver hydatid cyst have not been resolved because of scarce experience worldwide.

Objectives

The aim of our study was to compare surgical outcome of laparoscopic approach with open surgery for the management of hepatic hydatid disease.

Methods

It was a retrospective and prospective study conducted in the department of surgery SKIMS Srinagar over a period of eight years from January 2008 to January 2016 in Sheri Kashmir institute of medical sciences Srinagar India, Srinagar. The study included all the adult patients admitted with a diagnosis of hepatic hydatid disease and the total number of patients studied was 80. All patients were pre-operatively and post- operatively treated with Albendazole. The patients were alternately taken either for laparoscopic approach or for open approach. For data that was included retrospectively patients were enrolled in either groups based upon the type of surgery they had undergone. Patients were followed for any recurrence for a period ranging from one year to six years with an average follow up period of 24 months. All the data was entered in detailed proforma and analysed.

Results

Mean age of presentation was 40.27 years in open group and 38.80 years for laparoscopic group. Majority of patients (55%) presented with pain abdomen. Mean operative time was 60.43 minutes in open group and 89.80 min. for laparoscopic group. Two patients (5%) from the laparoscopic group had to be converted to open. In laparoscopic group mean hospital stay was 3.40 days while in open group it was 8.73 days. Mean time to return to work was 8.10 days in laparoscopic group and 20.70 days in open group. In laparoscopic group none of the patients had surgical site infection while as in open group 4 (10%) had surgical site infection. In laparoscopic group, biliary leak was seen in 3 (7.5 %) patients, while in open group it was seen in 2 (5%) patients. Recurrence was seen in 2 (5%) patients who underwent open surgery, while as recurrence was not seen in any of the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery.

Conclusions

Based on our encouraging results from our current study, we conclude that laparoscopic hydatid surgery is safe and feasible for selected patients in which criteria is met, motivated primarily by lower post-operative morbidity, mortality and recurrence.

Full-Text [PDF 101 kb]   (1018 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Basic Science
Received: 2017/06/27 | Accepted: 2017/10/20 | ePublished: 2017/11/15

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Annals of Bariatric Surgery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb