Volume 6, Issue 1 (2-2017)                   ABS 2017, 6(1): 100-110 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Garneau P Y, Garofalo F, Deslauriers V, Bacon S L, Denis R, Pescarus R, et al . Neuromuscular Blockade, Bariatric Surgeon Satisfaction, and Quality of Patient Recovery. ABS 2017; 6 (1) :100-110
URL: http://annbsurg.iums.ac.ir/article-1-202-en.html
1- Department of Surgery, Division of Bariatric Surgery, Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, 5400 boul Gouin O., Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada
2- Centre de Medecine Comportementale de Montreal, Hopital du Sacre-Cœur, Montreal, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Abstract:   (918 Views)
Background

To date, little is known about neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and its impact in bariatric surgery and patient recovery. The goal of this study was to better assess the relationship between depth of NMB, bariatric surgeon’s satisfaction, and the quality of patient recovery.

Methods

Between January and September 2015, we did a prospective observational study of 50 morbidly obese patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) under general anesthesia at our ambulatory surgical center. Rocuronium was used for tracheal intubation with bolus doses to maintain NMB. NMB was monitored at 5 minute intervals during the surgery, and at 30 second intervals following the reversal agent. The surgeon was blind to all anesthesia procedures and scored the surgical working conditions at 15 min intervals. Demographic data, operative data, and conditions were analyzed.

Results

42 females and 8 males, with a mean age of 38.8 years (range: 19 to 60, standard deviation (SD): ± 9.2), and mean BMI of 43.9 (range: 36 to 58, SD: ± 5.1), underwent a LSG. Mean total surgical time was 63 minutes (range: 35 to 128). During the laparoscopic part of the surgery, 22% of the patients were in deep block and 78% were in moderate block. Six patients presented “poor” or “extremely poor” surgical conditions, and 6 patients had a sudden increase in intra-abdominal pressure. None of these patients were in deep block at that time. Patients in deep NMB had a shorter laparoscopic time (37 minutes, SD ± 7.1 vs 53 minutes, SD ± 18.3; P = 0.006).

Conclusions

This study found that deep NMB prevents inappropriate abdominal cavity movement, consequently improving the operating area and the surgeon satisfaction.

Full-Text [PDF 136 kb]   (728 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Basic Science
Received: 2016/12/22 | Accepted: 2017/02/18 | ePublished: 2017/02/15

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Annals of Bariatric Surgery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb