جلد 2، شماره 3 - ( - )                   جلد 2 شماره 3 صفحات 0-0 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Soroush A, Pourbakhtyaran E, Allame S, Zamani M M, Etemadi M, Nasiri S. Harmonic Scalpel is more Secure than Conventional Methods in Total Thyroidectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. ABS 2013; 2 (3)
URL: http://annbsurg.iums.ac.ir/article-1-277-fa.html
Harmonic Scalpel is more Secure than Conventional Methods in Total Thyroidectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. سالنامه جراحی چاقی. 2 (3)

URL: http://annbsurg.iums.ac.ir/article-1-277-fa.html


چکیده:   (627 مشاهده)
Background: Traditional haemostatic techniques in total thyroidectomy may cause some damages to surrounding tissues. It is believed that these damages can be reduced using ultrasonic dissector devices like Harmonic Scalpel (HS). Objective: In this study, we investigated the efficacy of ultrasonic dissectors (HS) versus conventional techniques (Clamp and Tie). Patients and Methods: A single blinded randomized clinical trial was performed at a referral educational center. Sixty eight eligible participants were enrolled and assigned to conventional group (operated with Clamp and Tie technique) and HS group (operated with Harmonic Scalpel). The following items were recorded in both groups: haemostatic technique, operative blood loss, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, pathology, thyroid weight, postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, change in calcemia, pain, drainage volume and hematoma formation. Results: The results demonstrated that application of HS in thyroidectomy significantly reduces operating time (P ≤ 0.0001) and Intra operative bleeding (P ≤ 0.0001). Postoperative drainage (P ≤ 0.0001), pain (P ≤ 0.0001), hypocalcemia (P ≤ 0.0001), and length of hospitalization (P ≤ 0.0001) were significantly lower in HS group. Voice score was significantly lower in HS group (P ≤ 0.0001). Conclusions: HS in total thyroidectomy, reduces operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain, drainage volume, voice changes, and postoperative hypocalcemia, compared to conventional techniques.
     
نوع مطالعه: Original | موضوع مقاله: MIS
دریافت: 1399/10/18 | پذیرش: 1392/5/24 | انتشار الکترونیک: 1392/5/24

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Annals of Bariatric Surgery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb