Annals of Bariatric Surgery

en Vertical Gastric Plication: Is It Ready for Prime-Time? MIS MIS Letter/Editorial Letter/Editorial The incidence of obesity has been increasing steadily, with approximately 10% of the world’s population meeting the criteria (1). The limited success of lifestyle and pharmaceutical interventions has resulted in an increased interest in bariatric surgery, as it is the only proven modality for achieving sustainable weight loss, and impacting survival in the clinically severe obese (BMI ≥ 40 or ≥ 35 with severe co-morbid disease) (2). In general, bariatric surgical intervention involves either a restrictive or mal-absorptive mechanism, to achieve weight loss. The two most renowned and successful procedures are; the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, and these use both routes. However, both of these procedures have potentially life threatening post-operative complications, mainly entailing leakage at anastomoses sites, thus making them less than ideal interventions. Gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy and now recently gastric plication, are other bariatric surgeries that are essentially restrictive procedures, which are becoming more popular (3). Of the restrictive procedures, Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) and Laparoscopic Total Gastric Vertical Plication (LTGVP) are relatively similar. Both involve decreasing the greater curvature of the stomach, and creating a gastric reservoir resembling a vertical tube (3). In general, LSG accomplishes this goal with staple lines and removal of a gastric section, while LTGVP achieves it with suture lines, without the need for a gastric section. The advantages of both procedures consist of; not introducing a foreign object into the body, preserving the stomach’s pylorus, and avoiding dumping syndrome (2). However, there are some advantages enjoyed only by plication. Since LTGVP does not involve the removal of gastric material, it has the ability to be reversible, which could make it a more ideal surgical procedure for some patients (4). Another reported benefit of LTGVP is that it decreases the risk of fistula formation at the gastroesophageal junction. It is important to recognize that these stated surgical advantages of LTGVP rely on the operator’s competency at minimally invasive techniques, in this case to perform manual laparoscopic suturing (4). This article highlights the promise that LTGVP has shown in achieving significant weight loss and reduction of comorbid conditions. Golpaie et al. have produced a well-organized study design that involved a multidisciplinary team. The drawbacks of this study were that; only Obesity Bariatric Surgery Weight Loss 0 0 http://annbsurg.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-31-241&slc_lang=en&sid=1 Noah Switzer 1003194753284600761 1003194753284600761 No 1 Center for the Advancement of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Kourosh Sarkhosh 1003194753284600762 1003194753284600762 No 1 Center for the Advancement of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Shahzeer Karmali 1003194753284600763 1003194753284600763 Yes 1 Center for the Advancement of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada